I agree

At least in one respect it is getting a bit better. Tax changes are making long term investments more appealing by giving preferential treatment to capital gains and dividends.

BUT, without capital, there would be very little business or growth. To get my capital a company would have to be able to compensate me more than the amount I could get sitting it in a money market account because I am taking a risk.

Bob

>Robert,
>
>For me, and of course I know nothing, the problem is deeper, is the bastardization of the Share concept. It used to be a way of helping companies or individuals to get money to build/create/comercialize their products and then sharing the profits, now is just a mean for mean people to get rich at the expenses of the work of others, the shares are no longer serving its purpose of a relatively long term investement, it is just a tool for speculators with short term goals, sometimes shorter than a quarter, completely untying the value of the share with the value of the company. For example, Microsoft did not pay dividens for YEARS (I know they started paying not long ago), although my understanding is that by law it is mandatory to pay dividends and even more, it is not allowed to stockpile money unless there is a plan for it; of course Microsoft shareholders do not complain, for they can make money with the always rising price of the stock, and this creates the need for this ever rising
>price. I would like to see what would happen is the regulations change so you are committed to keep a share for at least one year from the time you bought it.
>
>>I agree that companies should be looking at the long term, but in reality they are looking quarter to quarter and so are their stockholders. If they felt that it was in their own interest to cultivate long term goodwill, they would do so.
>>