I cannot fathom any way (including national security reasons) for allowing that behavior. In fact, won't it put him on the national sexual offenders listing? Afterall, a youngster under the age of 18 was involved in the messages (according to what I heard on the radio).
>>What bothers me most about this is the fact that many (including reporters in the media) knew about this since 2003 and did nothing until now. I would hate to think that they were waiting for the most opportune time (regarding politics) and not the well-being of the young...
>
>Are we to expect a law which will somehow make this legal retroactively, if done for national security reasons?
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
