>>>No, it's not in the UT lib. It is on my own website. Can you try again, or else be more specific?!
>>
>>Ah, I got it this time. Thanks.
>>
>>Interesting. I see your scheme. I'll ponder it some more.
>
>Hope to hear more from you. The feedback is really minimal so far. I think that's a real pity, because the subject is too important for such ignorance by the community.

Well we all have our naming conventions and loads of code. Who'd go through all of that and impose new conventions all over? It surely got more than just a few of us thinking of how to do things next time, but I guess very few are in PeterRR's good luck to have a chance to do a general cleanup.

It truly is a conundrum - you can come up with a good naming scheme after having a lot of experience with whatever you were using, but by the time you gain that experience, you have a lot of code already done. Then it's the dilemma of washing or making new.