Marc,

>Come on :)! Kim could have used == and he would have had the
>'expected behaviour' no matter how exact was set. If MS is
>listening, there are more urgent things that require their
>attention. (s)
>
>Regards,
>
>Marc

Ok, it was a bad example (a bad mood also i guess :)),
anyway i think VFP programming language can be greatly improved
to make it more consistent. But u're right, MS guys have more
urgent things in their mind, for example "NetScape" :)

J. Luis