>I would say so yes. The college is a part of the California state university system I think.

How about article on 9/11 ?

It is hard to believe how towers can colapse *straight* down, one after the other, after being hit by planes, but how/why WTC7 colapsed WITHOUT being hit - is way beyond my comprehension.

I saw recently 'In Plane Site' movie about conspiracy theory
surrounding 9/11 events.

The same question boggled me this time (I saw it again) , just like back then when I saw official video footage of Pentagon hit. How come you cannot
(could not back then) see actual PLANE on it ?!?
I am not talking about missing debris / bodies (discussed in movie), but actual moment of impact and explosion.

No plane - not soever!

Discussing this back in october 2001, wld hv been perhaps emotionally overcharged, but how about now? With heads cooled down, does anybody hv reasonable explanation for this ?

Another strange thing.
Second tower was hit higher up to the left. It piersed trough building, flames comming out both on a side, and back of the builduing.
If impact/explosion had blown away internal wals making huge hole/damage LEFT to the vertical axis, wld it be normal for a tall object to colapse - sideway ? (like when timber is cut)
This straight down fall never looked ok to me.

I am not insinuating anything, just naturally curious.