Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Surprise - Christian Right duped by Bush & Co
Message
From
13/10/2006 14:43:21
 
 
To
13/10/2006 13:08:41
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01161646
Message ID:
01161888
Views:
13
I would agree about the estate tax. He obviously looked at it solely from a personal point of view. However, from everything else I've read and heard, this is the only case where I would argue that point.

Everything else is a clear case of publicly stating points of view that the religious right wanted to hear, while actually doing as little as possible. For example, and this is something that was mentioned earlier in the bush presidency, the author, along with his team were responsible for ensuring that republican speeches contained phrases that had significant meaning to the religious right. To the lay person, these phrases meant nothing. They were basically code words to evangelicals.

You can look up Keith Oblermann. He's talked about this the last 2 nights, and you can find clips of his interviews to see more examples of what's discussed in the book.

In addition, Tucker Carlson has brought up this very point earlier. When he was questioned about how he could arrive at a viewpoint that evangelicals were used, he said something about because he lives with these people all day and he knows what they think. And that they could care less about the religious right, other then doing whatever they can to get their vote.

>It appears that the author has a 'more less' accurate view of the current administration. Not surprised at all.
>
>However, I have an issue with one of the items - specifically the estate tax. First, stating that only the richest americans benefited from ending the estate tax to begin with is false. Anyone who has had to deal with federal taxes on estates after losing a family member can attest to that (myself being one). True, americans would donate revenue from the sale of the estate to charities to avoid paying the tax (or donate the estate), but that doesn't mean that americans should continue to suffer an estate tax just so charities can get their financial support via that route. I didn't read more indepth (I would have to get the book) to determine if I disagreed with any other items but that one had a personal touch for me so it jumped right out.
>
>
>
>>http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/10/12/tempting-faith-christian-conservatives-duped-by-bushco-part-ii/

(On an infant's shirt): Already smarter than Bush
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform