Hmmm... I don't think you'll find the word "genocide" used by the Canadian GOVERNMENT in connection with anything to do with the treatment of the Indians here. But I'm quite sure that most people, and lots of historians, would call it such regardless.

When I think about it, I can't see **any** government ever calling any actions by itself, even if way back in history, "genocide". It would be magnanimous if they did, but I just don't see it happening.





>As far as I know, there is no federal recognition of the Armenian Genocide and the American Government does not officially use the term 'genocide' to describe the event - did I miss something ruled on by our Congress?
>
>
>
>>>Nor is this a problem only in Turkey. To give one example, China has been angered about some Japanese history book, which talked about the "Nanking incident" (it was actually not an incident, but a large-scale massacer). Most other Japanese history books don't even mention the "incident".
>>
>>I don't remembered any law or remembrance day about Japans-Chinese massacer. But frenchs and americans did for turks-armenians massacer. It's only about politics.
>>
>>Actually I don't care about frenchs laws or others remembrance days about armenian massacer. Our politicans, army and newspapers take consider. I think so they're trying turn target from economical and social problems...