Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Am I dumb or what
Message
From
27/10/2006 13:37:27
 
 
To
27/10/2006 03:25:36
Neil Mc Donald
Cencom Systems P/L
The Sun, Australia
General information
Forum:
Space
Category:
Articles
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01161830
Message ID:
01165111
Views:
27
>>>>Force(s) cause the failure, not energy - they are two different things.
>>>
>>>You are wrong, there can be no force without energy expended, they are inexorably entwinded. This is a common misconception of many.
>>
>>According to classical mechanics, Hilmar's explanation in his latest post is correct. As I understand it (being a mechanical engineer), this is the theory employed by engineers and scientists when dealing in the macro world.
>
>Hilmar's is only reciting the current flawed model. As I understand things (being a Marine Engineer with over 35years experience encompassing most engineering disciplines) and having done a lot a research in these areas I was pointing out some of the errors in the current model.

The "flawed model" has been successfully used to design, build, and operate the vast majority, if not all of the equipment you've worked with in your 35 years of experience. That's the true test of a theory.

If you have a different theory:

- tell us what it is and how it differs from the widely-accepted "flawed model"
- demonstrate how your theory performs better in explaining real-world phenomena

Simply telling others that their ideas are "flawed" does not follow the scientific method.

>>
>>If you disagree with this, you are either:
>>
>>- talking about something other than classical mechanics/macroscopic phenomena (e.g. quantum phenomena), or
>>- proposing a different theory
>>
>>Which one is it?
>
>Both.
>
>During my training back in the early 70's we had lengthy discussions with our lecturers on the cavitation phenomena and also reviewed a great deal of research this subject.
>We all came to the conclusion that the observed phenomena was occurring at the subatomic level or quantum level, as the energy levels allowable under the current model could not go within 1% of explaining the observed damage.
>
>This is OLD news.

Back in the '70s, were you aware of sonoluminesence? I first became aware of it from the February 1995 issue of Scientific American: http://www.sciamdigital.com/index.cfm?fa=Products.ViewIssuePreview&ARTICLEID_CHAR=7F935A9D-3335-44BA-9C3D-8D184ED2F2C
Regards. Al

"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." -- Isaac Asimov
"Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right." -- Isaac Asimov

Neither a despot, nor a doormat, be

Every app wants to be a database app when it grows up
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform