I think that people who support the position of mr rush (and those like him) have no moral values that society will benefit from. His listeners who support him, his advertisers and broadcasting outlets seem to think that there is value to such discussion. Perhaps mr rush can go on satellite radio like someone else did.

The good news is that we do not have to tune in to see or listen to such trash. What can you expect if you look into a garbage can?

With his hypocrisy, demeaning and condemning words mr rush attempts to be the pulse of the nation. Look to home mr rush. Clean your own house first before you criticize others.


>Oh yea. He's totally on rush's side. But let me qualify please. I mean in his discussions on stem cell research.
>
>The only potential good to come out of this was mentioned in a story I read this morning (that I of course lost the link to). It was an editorial written by a professor of bio-ethics. He said that the lobby supporting medical research for diseases such as parkinson's is incredibly large.
>
>And that this disgusting portrayal by rush will help to get out the disabled vote this election.
>
>>>That's my point. Of course you can critize someone's views. But that appears to not be in the repub playbook. All personal smears, all the time. Please show me one medical expert who supports rush in his endevors please.
>>
>>His pill pusher! The medical doctor who signs his prescriptions.
>>
>>>
>>>>Hey, Perry,
>>>>
>>>>I don't think John is 'supporting' Rush [at least I hope not], I just think there's a difference between Limbaugh criticizing Fox' postion, versus taking shots at Fox personally.
>>>>
>>>>John is essentially right, just because Fox has the disease, doesn't make his views immune to criticism. But Limbaugh didn't even try to go there, he just went on this childish attack about Fox either exaggerating, or not taking his medicine.
>>>>
>>>>Kevin