>The position I do support of Mr. Limbaugh's is that when a person puts forth what they say is gospel, that there is someone to put forth opposing viewpoints. Mr. Fox has a terrible desease and would love to have a cure, as I would like to see a cure for it also. But Mr. Fox needs to be questioned also and not just given a free pass. If he believes his position is correct then he should be able to debate it. When people who call themselves journalist, just sit and listen and take it all in as gospel, then are they really journalists? This is a very tough subject, but there are facts on both side that need to be brought out by those that declare themselves to be journalists.
>
>My two cents..

When did Limbaugh question or expressed an interest in debating Mr. Fox? He callously ridiculed and mocked him. That's all. Did he (or you or anybody else on the far right) question him when he supported Senator Arlen Specter back in 2004? Why not? The issue was the same.

When you talk about journalists, I assume you are not talking about Limbaugh. He's not a journalist, just a talk show host. As per journalists questioning, who are you referring to in this specific case?

You do remember that the House and Senate passed the Stem Cell research bill overwhelmingly. In fact, about 20 of the 60 senators voting for it where Republicans. Yet that was the only bill that our esteemed president decided to veto.

Let kids continue suffering and dying from juvenile diabetes, let Mr. Fox and others suffer. Just as a reminder, the four diseases most believed to benefit from stem cell research ar Juvenile Diabetes, Spinal Chord issues, Alzheimer and Parkinson.

Mr. Fox is young enough to be able to hope for some kind of cure or relief in his lifetime. Except that the people like the president and Mr. Limbaugh do not care. (even Nancy Reagan and many other Republicans spoke *for* it).