Ah the religious wingnuts with the superior moral values have come out of the closet.

rush did nothing to question Mr. Fox!!!! He attempted in his own sad, demented way to ridicule him. That you, who claim religous superiority, would defend rush, does not surprise me anymore.

As I've stated before, show me one person who has any kind of expertise in the medical field who has questioned Mr. Fox on this ad. Hint, I haven't found any. Anyone who has an MD after their name is saddened by rush's personal attack.

Go back to the hole you came out of.

>The position I do support of Mr. Limbaugh's is that when a person puts forth what they say is gospel, that there is someone to put forth opposing viewpoints. Mr. Fox has a terrible desease and would love to have a cure, as I would like to see a cure for it also. But Mr. Fox needs to be questioned also and not just given a free pass. If he believes his position is correct then he should be able to debate it. When people who call themselves journalist, just sit and listen and take it all in as gospel, then are they really journalists? This is a very tough subject, but there are facts on both side that need to be brought out by those that declare themselves to be journalists.
>
>My two cents..
>
>
>>I think that people who support the position of mr rush (and those like him) have no moral values that society will benefit from. His listeners who support him, his advertisers and broadcasting outlets seem to think that there is value to such discussion. Perhaps mr rush can go on satellite radio like someone else did.