Alex,

When debates get into a "he said she said" discussion, then nothing every gets resolved and accuracy goes out the window. I just thought that something coming from the horse's mouth might be relevant. I guess I thought wrong.



>>I think it is interesting that you and others can look at what CNN reported and come to the conclusions you have. I was listening when he made the comments about Fox and I came away with a different interpretation. Here is a couple of links from Rush if anyone is interested in the truth.
>>
>>http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_102706/content/e_mail_to_katie_couric.guest.html
>>
>>http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_102706/content/recap.guest.html
>
>The truth? Oh come on James!
>
>"I believe Democrats have a long history of using victims of various things as POLITICAL spokespeople because they believe they are untouchable, infallible. They are immune from criticism. But when anyone enters the POLITICAL arena of ideas they forfeit the right to be challenged on their participation and message."
>
>Why didn't he complain when Michael Fox did a political ad for Arlen Specter (R), as I asked before in this thread? (and inclluded in the link below)
>Why didn't he complained when republicans use victims in ads, like M.J. Fox or Willie Horton (remember him?)
>
>
>"I did NOT mock or make fun of Mr. Fox."
>
>No? Then what was all the mimicking of the shaking body momevents he did whe he was stupid enough to have a camera rolling in the studio during his radio tirade?
>Have you seen the Limbaugh video?
>http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/10/25/olbermann-gives-us-the-visual-to-limbaughs-attack-on-michael-j-fox/
>
>
>He's full of it and you seem to be too.