These may be too simple, but they are a good basic overview:
http://www.superstringtheory.com/http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/everything.htmlhttp://www.nuclecu.unam.mx/~alberto/physics/string.htmlThe nova special on pbs that was very well done. If you ever come across it, don't miss it.
>>Hi,
>>
>>I was just trying to point out one of the inconsistencies in the current theoretical model in the simplest terms possible, but Hilmar won't budge from his point of view.
>>
>>BTW I have great trouble accepting a model that can only account for 4% of the matter in the universe and has to come up with a spooky concept of dark energy and dark matter to account for the other 96% to make their model work.
>>
>>I have done a fair bit of research (both practical and theoretical) on parts of this subject over the last 30 years, and
>>it wasn't until recently that firstly String Theory and then Membrane Theory were released that everything started to fall into place.
>
>As a partially informed spectator, I'm quite interested in string theory - sounds promising. Any good link to a place where it'd be explained so that a mathematician with less-than-expert knowledge of physics may understand?
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"