Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Kerry’s comments
Message
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01165967
Message ID:
01166396
Views:
19
How about the police force, a police officer?

They're not kids. They're adults by the time they're old enough to enlist/join/apply.



>I guess I just don't like the idea of a kid having a job where being shot at is reqirement.
>
>>Do you allow your kids to:
>>
>>1. Drive - A life or death activity. More likely to be killed in an auto accident than in war.
>>2. Drink - ditto
>>3. Have Sex
>>4. Smoke
>>5. Cross streets
>>6. Fly
>>7. Marital Arts
>>8. Fire weapons
>>9. Swim, etc, ad nauseum...?
>>
>>All are just as dangerous as being in the military. I was there for nearly 30 years and saw combat only sparsely.
>>I bet if you compare statistics of military deaths per capita to driving deaths per capita, the driving deaths would so far outnumber the military deaths to be completely unarguable.
>>
>>
>>>Well I suppose I see your point here. But you're dealing with a life-or-death issue here - and yes, it is that extreame of an issue (100+ last month..right?) Hey I think a young adult should be able to have the opportunity to say no to smoking crack, but I'm sure as heck not going to give the crack dealer the kids phone number so he can call and present the opportunity to let the kid make a choice.
>>>
>>>>Granted, I would not argue otherwise. However, the issue is not whether or not military service is the right path for your child and who is capable (or legally able to) make that decision, but rather restricting the presenting of the information and why it should not be available for the young adult in order to give them the opportunity to make a choice and review his/her options.
>>>
>>>>>Parent make decisions to keep their children safe everyday. An adult is going to have more life-experience and, for the most part, be better equipped to make judgment calls than a teenager.
>>>>>
>>>>>>That surprises me. I really didn't think you didn't trust your son's judgment? I see no other reason for opt out paperwork to be completed. Afterall, recruiters only present the options to kids, they cannot draft anyone. They cannot force anyone to do anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In fact, IIRC, NCLB requires high schools to provide the names and addresses of their students to the military. I know we signed a form requesting Nathaniel's name be withheld from that list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tamar
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>This was explained to me by a co-worker. This is something new, part of the "no child left behind" instituted by bush a couple years ago.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Where do you come up with this? During my time as a recruiter, we visited each of the highschools, vo-tech schools, adult schools and college compases in our districts about once a month. No one forced the schools to allow us to do so.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If its in the education package, then bravo. The kids will get to hear an alternative to further schooling.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I don't know the specifics, but I've talked to several parents who are very upset that one of the rules of "no child left behind" requires letting military recruiters on campus.
>>>>>>>>>>
The American Republic will endure, until politicians realize they can bribe the people with their own money.
- Alexis de Tocqueville

No man’s life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session.
– Mark Twain (1866)
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform