>Wrong.. recruiters have routine access to schools for years. During my tenure as a recruiter, we visitied all kinds of schools on a monthly basis.

Just because you visited schools doesn't mean that the schools were under "contract" to allow you to do so.
Yours is flawed logic, John.


>
>
>
>>>>This was explained to me by a co-worker. This is something new, part of the "no child left behind" instituted by bush a couple years ago.
>>>
>>>It's my understanding that this has been a common clause whenever any institution (of learning) accepts funds from the Federal government. for whatever reason.
>>>I think the new twist was that this had NOT been so at the 'regular' school levels until No Child Left Behind, reserved for the more adult learning venues.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Where do you come up with this? During my time as a recruiter, we visited each of the highschools, vo-tech schools, adult schools and college compases in our districts about once a month. No one forced the schools to allow us to do so.
>>>>>
>>>>>If its in the education package, then bravo. The kids will get to hear an alternative to further schooling.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't know the specifics, but I've talked to several parents who are very upset that one of the rules of "no child left behind" requires letting military recruiters on campus.
>>>>>>