Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Kerry’s comments
Message
From
02/11/2006 13:48:00
 
 
To
02/11/2006 13:20:48
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01165967
Message ID:
01166686
Views:
17
But if you take the numbers over a decade or more and average them, I suspect that you will find Military lower then at least the first three, because, Yes the military deaths spikes when there is a war on, but during peace, it is much lower. Logger, fisherman and flyer all are steady losses.

>Except that you are linking to a money cnn report from 2003. If you link to the current one from August 2006 here, you'll see partway down the page, the following statement:
>
>
>The BLS does not count combat deaths in its survey;
>if it did, the military would undoubtedly have qualified
>as America's most dangerous job last year.
>
>
>I suspect the Bureau of Labour Statistics didn't include combat deaths in 2003 either.
>
>>Those are actuarial statistics based on per capita rates. The military doesn't even make the list. They have less of a chance of getting killed in their profession than those on the list (statistically speaking). The apologist crowd will just ignore the facts and make up their liberal gobbly-gook (sp?). The libs don't want facts and logic, they want "make-me-feel-good" emotionalism.
>>
>>
>>>Have you looked at the internet for dangerous jobs? I did a google and found 2 different sites that list 10 of the most hazardous jobs.
>>>
>>>http://money.cnn.com/2003/10/13/pf/dangerousjobs/
>>>http://www.forbes.com/2002/09/03/0903worksafe.html
>>>
>>>how many jobs other then the military have over 1 million (not sure of the exact number) employed at the same time? Timber cutters lost 84 out of 100,000 in 2002.
>>>
>>>>You said this:
>>>>"the military is no more dangerous than most other professions"
>>>>
>>>>I'm not sidestepping anything by saying I think you're wrong and that is ridiculous. (yeah my spelling stinks...heh)
>>>>
>>>>What other professions here in the USA lost 105 people last month due to the nature of the job, hummm? I assure you that "most other professions" did not loose 105 people due to the nature of their job. What does this have to do with driving your car? ...unless you're a truck driver or something....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Again, without side-stepping the argument:
>>>>>
>>>>>Statistics show that you have a greater chance of being killed or seriously injured by driving your car than you do by being in the military. Therefore, driving is more dangerous than being in the military.
>>>>>
>>>>>P.S. The word is "ridiculous"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tamar:
>>>>>>>... the military is no more dangerous than most other professions.....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's ridicilious.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform