>I guess it's no surprise:
>
>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52747


No surprise that WorldNutDaily runs this stuff or some other surprise? According to Ron Suskind’s book, The One Percent Doctrine, he has it going the other way.

“Their [the CIA’s] assessments, at day’s end, are a distillate of the kind of secret, internal conversations that the American public [was] not sanctioned to hear: strategic analysis. Today’s conclusion: bin-Laden’s message was clearly designed to assist the President’s reelection.

“At the five o’clock meeting, [deputy CIA director] John McLaughlin opened the issue with the consensus view: ‘Bin-Laden certainly did a nice favor today for the President.’”

But the CIA analysts also felt that bin-Laden might have recognized how Bush’s policies – including the Guantanamo prison camp, the Abu Ghraib scandal and the endless bloodshed in Iraq – were serving al-Qaeda’s strategic goals for recruiting a new generation of jihadists

http://consortiumnews.com/2006/070306.html