>Are you saying that Aaron Klein is an unreliable journalist? Is this information inaccurate? Did the interviews not take place? Or are you saying that news is inaccurate simply because it comes from World Net Daily? I don't believe the article was an editorial (in which case I could understand your statement). Did I miss something unreliable or words taken out of context in the article? From what I read, WND Jerusalem's bureau interviewed those leaders, correct?

My original remark was after reading the headline and the upper part of the article. But I stick by the comment now that I've read the whole thing.

While it says posted Nov2/06 the heading is dated November 6, 2006 - 1 day before the election.
Do you think it would have rated publication if the "terrorist leaders" had said they believed a Republican win would be better for them?
How does one manage to "interview" wanted (in Isreal) terrorist leaders without the terrorist leaders now being dead?
These are NOT the same "terrorist leaders" that the U.S. is pressing so hard to kill or capture, but rather terrorist leaders who are doing their thing in Isreal and who are not at all likely to ever set foot on U.S. soil legally or otherwise.

There was no need to mention either the John Kerry "gaff", nor Ms. Pelosi, in the article other than for purposes of tweaking right-leaning readers a bit more.

I have no idea "who" WorldNetDaily is, even after reading their "About us". But I find it easy to conclude that they have an agenda with is article.


>
>
>
>
>
>>>I guess it's no surprise:
>>>
>>>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52747
>>
>>Considering the source, no surprise at all.