I was surprised to see you post this.

Did you notice this strangley unrelated snippet:

[The debate became especially poignant following remarks by Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., the 2004 presidential candidate who voted in support of the war in Iraq. Earlier this week he intimated American troops are uneducated, and it is the uneducated who "get stuck in Iraq."

Kerry, under intense pressure from fellow Democrats, now says his remarks were a "botched joke." ]

I think this alone throws the authors integrity into question. I have questions about how the interviews were conducted. What are they responding to, quotes they were given by democrats? saying the same thing republicans are saying?

I do not believe terrorists follow the midterms elections, candidates postitions, or that they really care who wins. The one was quoted as saying "This is why American Muslims will support the Democrats". Do you think this accurate? Do you think that these guys have any idea about our elections?

What are your conculsions from this article? Terrorists want democrats to will so we should vote for republicans? Like I said I am surprised.




>Are you saying that Aaron Klein is an unreliable journalist? Is this information inaccurate? Did the interviews not take place? Or are you saying that news is inaccurate simply because it comes from World Net Daily? I don't believe the article was an editorial (in which case I could understand your statement). Did I miss something unreliable or words taken out of context in the article? From what I read, WND Jerusalem's bureau interviewed those leaders, correct?
>
>
>
>
>
>>>I guess it's no surprise:
>>>
>>>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52747
>>
>>Considering the source, no surprise at all.