>>>>Unnatural is a subjective opinion.
>>>
>>>Sure. It is quite clear to me that the current tendency is more and more to consider homosexuality a natural option.
>>
>>Ignore any tendency for the moment. You admit that what you (or I) consider natural or unnatural is a subjective opinion. Hence, perhaps it is and perhaps it isn't.
>
>It is not subjective at all. Unnatural as in against nature. For Darwinians, evolution and natural selection would eventually weed out homosexuality (or at least keep it marginalized) since reproduction is not possible unless you believe a few million years of homsexuality would eventually evolve the particular species into asexual beings. For Creationists, it is a moral issue.

Chicken or the egg? For creationists it was the chicken. For Darwinians, it was the egg. Me? I don't care. I'll eat both!