>>>>Unnatural is a subjective opinion.
>>>
>>>Sure. It is quite clear to me that the current tendency is more and more to consider homosexuality a natural option.
>>
>>Ignore any tendency for the moment. You admit that what you (or I) consider natural or unnatural is a subjective opinion. Hence, perhaps it is and perhaps it isn't.
>
>It is not subjective at all. Unnatural as in against nature. For Darwinians, evolution and natural selection would eventually weed out homosexuality (or at least keep it marginalized) since reproduction is not possible unless you believe a few million years of homsexuality would eventually evolve the particular species into asexual beings. For Creationists, it is a moral issue.

You are defining homosexuality as unnatural because you cannot reproduce in a homosexual relationship. Besides not actually being true in nature it also sets a subjective measure to which you want to apply what is natural.

If homosexuality is a result of natural causes - Message #1170059 - then it is part of nature and hence natural. Whether a particular trait eventually disappears or not does not make that trait any more or less natural.