>>That's a different statemant that equating homosexuality with bestiality
>
>Oh, that. Well, perhaps they are not exactly equal, but I consider both homosexuality and bestiality are unnatural.
>
>And, many of the arguments for legalizing a homosexual marriage might equally be applied to the other case.

Well you've shocked me too, Hilmar. Do you then reckon that homosexuals got that way artificially? Whatever genes and tendancies you're born with, surely, are "natural"?

Now then, the purpose of gay marriage isn't to legalise or endorse "unnatural acts" but rather to give people who have made a life-long committment to each other the same rights, as to "widows" pension, tax relief, inheritance, etc., as hetero relns.

What's your soln. - to force them into unhappy and unworkable hetero relns, like in the bad old days of unhappy sham marriages?