>>>>It is not subjective at all. Unnatural as in against nature. For Darwinians, evolution and natural selection would eventually weed out homosexuality (or at least keep it marginalized) since reproduction is not possible unless you believe a few million years of homsexuality would eventually evolve the particular species into asexual beings. For Creationists, it is a moral issue.
>>>
>>>Wow, you are really really incorrect here regardless of if you are pro/con about this issue. (That said, I am *not* going to set about attempting to persuade you with a bunch of links or pity answers.) But my God man, you outta be embarrased about such an uninformed assertion about natural selection processes ("Darwinians" as you say). It is evident you do not know what you are talking about.
>>
>>I am so thrilled to know you are so enlightened. I'll rejoing the evolving blobs in the murky bog now.
>
>Haha! Good one Mark. And thanks for taking it well, it was meant in the sincerest of ways.
>
>Now... what's that smell!?! Oh, yeah. Back down you go! [glurp, blop, schmock, ffissssss]

I actually find this topic to be an interesting thread. I just like stirring the pot, so to speak, then throw the spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. (I actually used to do that in my bachelor days to see if the spaghetti was done. And yes I did clean that up. My only evolving cultures were refridgerator-based.)