You are not arguing whether or not homosexuality is natural or not - it is indeed simply because it has existed in nature for as long as man can remember. The argument you are presenting is what is natural and acceptable in the eyes of the Lord based on your religious beliefs. I am assuming that it is based on Romans 1:26-27, Corinthians 6:9, Matthew 5:22 and 19:4 and 19:10, or Timothy 1:9?

How do you explain:

Ruth and Naomi
David and Jonathan
Ashpenaz and Daniel



>>>>>>I never imagined that you'd say something like that.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sorry to disappoint you, but I don't consider gay marriage "progress".
>>>>
>>>>That's a different statemant that equating homosexuality with bestiality
>>>
>>>Pardom me for jumping in..
>>>
>>>Sorry but, very close, almost same.. If we analyze.. both are completely not natural..
>>
>>In fact homosexuality IS natural as it is observed at 1,500 different species. Of course homosexuals do have less chance (but not completely zero, certainly not with modern artificial reproduction techniques:) ) to reproduce, but they certainly play a significant role in our society. It still not clear what exactly homosexuality means for the enduring existance of a whole population. They might have no significant role in evolution, but they might have a role in the survival of species (There is a link in this thread that makes that argument)
>>
>>Some of the most creative and entertaining minds comes from homosexuals. You only have to turn on the TV and watch all those gay artists, presentators, dancers. Since they generally don't think in terms of "wife, house, car, pet" they allow themselves to fully exploit their talents.
>
>Walter,
>
>sure... hey, We're not talking about preconcepts.. I do have many and many friends (some I really love them).. A very close member of my family is homo. and he is a nice guy, there isn't any problem with our relationship.
>
>The discution about is relativism and what is natural (or not) from a sexual perspective