Steven. Look it up in your human sex ed. 101 book.
You seem to be very obsessed with sex and genitals.


>>It isn't difficult at all. My answers to your questions was "in same ways it is".
>
>Ok, would you help me?
>Regarding:
>1) Genitals-based
> If a marriage is about a proper combination of genitals in some ways, please describe some of those ways. For example: must one have a vagina and the other a penis? Beyond genitalia, must one have chromosomes as XX and the other as XY?
>2) Offspring-based
> If a marriage is about offspring production capacities in some ways, please describe some of those ways. And what are some incapacities to produce offspring that would disqualify a couple from marriage? For example: being same-sexed, diseased, disinterested, propensity to pass genetic defect.
>
>>Or do you think you're the only one smart enough to know that marriage is about a many factors? Are you that narcissistic?
>I'm only wish to list the factors you require for 'marriage.' Your beliefs are not affected by my narcissism.
>
>Thanks for staying with me on this Sam,
>Steven-
>
>>>>>>>So marriage is:
>>>>>>>1) Genital-based
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Is it also offspring-based?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Again, In some ways yes. It is a part of it.
>>>>>>Wait a moment how come you won't answer my question(s)?
>>>>>
>>>>>Pardon. No, I've not met a homosexual couple that have, of their own accords, given birth to children.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Man, I didn't think my opinion would stir up so much messages.
>>>>>
>>>>>Easy, nothing to worry about. I just want to see 'marriage' directly defined as you assert it. Is that a problem?
>>>>>
>>>>>So far...
>>>>>
>>>>>Marriage is (assuming two persons):
>>>>>1) Genitals-based
>>>>> One *must* have a vagina and one *must* have a penis.
>>>>>2) Offspring-based
>>>>> The two are disqualified if unable to produce offspring.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ok Sam, your turn. Help me tweak this much before we move further.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I'm just answering your questions.
>>>
>>>And I appreciate it. Thank you.
>>>
>>>>Seems like you have problems anwsering your own question.
>>>How's that? Would you please help me define 'marriage' as *you* see it? I am quite serious an sincere about this.
>>
>>>
>>>1) Genitals-based
>>> Tell me Sam, if a couple have same-sexed genitals, does this disqualify them of 'marriage' accoding to you? Yes/No or please describe specifically the "some ways" you mentioned above.
>>>
>>>2) Offspring-based
>>> If a couple is unable to produce offspring, does this disquality them of 'marriage' according to you? Yes/No or please describe specifically the "again, in some ways" you've mentioned above.
>>>
>>>Thanks so much Sam. I know this is difficult and I am *not* baiting or gaming you. I want desperately to see 'marriage' as you define it spelled out before me.
>>
>>>
>>>Hey, this might be helpful: let's function just like we'd need to create a good VFP application? Let me explain -- how you define 'marriage' is, yes, your "business". And as this "business" owner, you are attempting to explain how this specific business practice called 'marriage' is to work. I'm your lowly software developer visiting for the "needs analysis". Namely, what does your business' 'marriage' gotta have to be a 'marriage'?
>>>
>>>Shall we?
>>>Thanks Sam,
>>>Steven-