Nope, don't have time. You can search on your own.
Gotta drive up to Mammoth for some Thanksgiving skiing.

later steven dude.


>>Steven, you must be either really lonely or be really .... never mind I promised myself I wouldn't resort to name calling.
>
>Thanks Sam, I'm feeling fine actually. And regardless of how I'm feeling or any names you may/not call me, it has no bearing on *your* choice to answer my question, does it?
>
>>Gee Steven, why do we as a society not allow marriage between close relatives?
>>Why is polygamy illegal?
>
>Perhaps I could also get your answers to these questions later. Still at the moment I'd really like for you answer the question I've already asked and offer an example of a marriage that can 'hurt' others as you've eluded to previously.
>
>Thanks, hope you're well,
>Steven-
>
>
>
>>>>Good come back Steven.
>>>>
>>>>But for the record. I never tried to define marriage to you or anyone else. In fact I said that I'm for all kind of marriage, as long as they don't hurt any else.
>>>
>>>
>>>What's an example of a marriage that would 'hurt' someone else?
>>>
>>>
>>>>I was just answering your questions as they were asked.
>>>
>>>>~sigh
>>>>have a good evening Steven.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Steven. Look it up in your human sex ed. 101 book.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks Sam for that reference. I do like books. Would you happened to have written one in which you succinctly articulate your requirements for a 'marriage' as you see it? I would eagerly refer to it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>You seem to be very obsessed with sex and genitals.
>>>>>
>>>>>Fortunately for us, any obsessions I have do not preclude you from telling me about what you believe a marriage requires, do they?
>>>>>
>>>>>Are you be willing/able to help me spell out what you require, and are talking about, when you use the word 'marriage'? For instance, may the couple be same-sexed? Y/N
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks again Sam,
>>>>>Steven-