Interesting. I found the headers interesting as well:


The neutrality of this article or section may be compromised by weasel words.
You can help Wikipedia by improving weasel-worded statements.
To better fit Wikipedia's style this article or section may require attention.
The current version of the article or section is written like an essay.
It should be rewritten as an encyclopedic entry. Please discuss this issue on the talk page. Editing help is available.

I did read the entire article though and found it somewhat opinionated, but not overly innaccurate. I would like to see some other opinions - because that entry is definitely opinionated and not sufficiently neutral in its writing...



>>http://zmagsite.zmag.org/Nov2006/munro1106.html
>>http://www.counterpunch.org/cohen11272003.html
>>http://www.nativecircle.com/mlmThanksgivingmyth.html
>>http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=3934
>
>It is interesting, all great nations (used without irony) embellish their history to great a sense of destiny and purpose. The US is the most recent example, but England, France, Italy, Russia have all done the same things. It makes Canadian history very boring by comparison.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_exceptionalism