>No offense intended, but may I ask why fine, and good enough are so often the answer? Why not go for the best performance, the easiest upgrade as opposed to trying to kick everyone off so you can put up a new exe? You're using a loader, so why say it's not necessary?
I explained the way I currently do it, and pointed out to alternatives often deemed better. Nor did I claim that the method I used was ideal. With that, I consider that I fulfilled my duty, as to giving correct information.
The question was about sharing the EXE. I don't see any major problem with that, although there may be better alternatives.
>The exe run from the server causes network traffic not just at the start, but continuously while the app runs, everytime the user starts a new form, or prg or whatever.
Won't the entire EXE eventually be in the local memory buffer? Assuming all the components are embedded in the EXE.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
