Rick,
Thank you very much for your help.
>Html Help 2.0 is a non-issue unless you plan on building developer documentation for integration in Visual Studio.
>
>At the moment HTML Help 1.0 continues to be the most widely used standard and HTML 2.0 is just a specialty case that will never go anywhere beyond where it is now. There is a new help system in Vista, although there hasn't been much information on what is actually involved with this (or let me rephrase that I haven't looked real closely into that).
>
>
>IAC, if you build end user documentation at the moment everything (FoxPro and .NET, Delphi etc.) consumes HTML Help 1.0 (CHM).
>
>Help Builder lets you build both 1.0 and 2.0 help.
>
>+++ Rick ---
>
>
>>I am confused as to what to choose when using West Wind HTML Help builder. What are the advantages of using HTML Help 2.0 vs 1.0? I believe in the past I have used 1.0, although this question never came up when I was building the HTML help last time (long time ago). Now I am looking for upgrading and building help again and came up against this choice.
>>
>>Any explanation would be greatly appreciated.
"The creative process is nothing but a series of crises." Isaac Bashevis Singer
"My experience is that as soon as people are old enough to know better, they don't know anything at all." Oscar Wilde
"If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too." W.Somerset Maugham
