>>Yeah. :-) I just wrote code that looked for bookmarks, didn't like it
>>(couldn't see them), and then re-wrote it to scan the MailMergeFields
>>collection, which seems to work pretty well. The Bookmark approach seems
>>cleaner somehow, though....
>How so "cleaner?" IMHO, I feel the opposite. At least for documentation.

I mean, using the Bookmarks collection to look at the MailMerge fields, instead of the MailMergeFields collection. One less layer of indirection, if I understand correctly....