Actually, the idea is that the output is the base text for comments by one or more reviewers. It is probably a prerequisite that is incompatible with your initial design. In that case, don't invest too much, unless many others here also show interest in the idea of a review tool. My impression that review tools are not widely used among vfp-developers. Pity.
>Hi Peter,
>
>
>Output xhtml is very complex and his importing into word can implicate any problems.
>Hmm, you need edit the output...
>
>I have one idea how to edit "comment" for classes and they PEM (from xhtml), but I don't know when I do it.
>
>MartiJ
>
>>Hi Martin,
>>
>>I have tried PDM. It's quite nice indeed. However, I was unable to make good use of the HTML in Word. Any time I press a hyperlink, it invokes the browser, instead of jumping to another location in the document. Therefore, use of Word's commenting facility is not really possible.
>>
>>Do you have any suggestion as to how it can be used as a tool in a code review process?
>>
>>
>>>Hi Peter,
>>>
>>>Because the best is PDM?
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
