>When you skim off the politics and industry shills (even if you don't) scientific consensu is that it is likey caused by humans.
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_of_recent_climate_change>
>Once again, my money is on the majority of experts not conservative politicians.
That old 'volcano' pablum is really beginning to show it's age too:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/02/020220075850.htmThis is dated but the 'volcano' angle was used about ozone concerns back in the day (15yrs ago?). Ditto-heads still like it though and think it's fine -- big cracks & all.
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1895>>No it isn't. That's half right. The expert consensus is that it exists, the debate is how much is human caused. Most climatologists will tell you that we contribute about 5% of the greenhouse gasses into the air.
>>
>>A normal volcano eruption will put more crap in the air than all human activities combined will in a given year.
>>
>>What bothers me is how this has become a political debate and not a scientific one.
>>
>>>>I really don't know if there is global warming.
>>>
>>>We're lay people. The expert consensus is that it exists and caused by humans
