>>>>>This didn't work for me. It took 32 s. to create a file and the returned files are in DOS like way (short names).
>>>>
>>>>I have a similar directory, with 27400 small images. First I thought you had foxpro.pif which uses command.com instead of cmd.exe, so I invoked each and ran dir >dir.txt. The time in both cases was below a second.
>>>>
>>>>The format of the text was like this (with just plain DIR, no switches):
>>>>

22.01.2005  11:17            39,749 CP701760.jpg
>>>>22.01.2005  11:17            35,626 CP701761.jpg
>>>>09.03.2004  12:37            23,487 No-Show-Image.jpg
>>>>07.02.2006  13:27                60 nocopy.BAK
>>>>07.02.2006  13:29               284 nocopy.bat

>>>>
>>>>Maybe you could use shell_execute to run the command? Just create a .bat file and run that. Shouldn't take that long. Even with my disk being recently defragmented, the difference shouldn't be so large.
>>>
>>>Would it still show the DOS window? I'd like to avoid it. I also didn't see times, only the file names like 1234~.jpg I run the command exactly as Hilmar wrote using my folder name and *.jpg
>>>
>>>Also note, that the directory resides on the server, not on my local drive.
>>
>>I just tried:
>>DIR /S *.* > testme.txt with remote connection to our office server. This commands runs for about 5 secs and creates a beautiful file :-). Not from VFP, because we didn't have VFP installed on server, just command prompt., also it stores all files with theitr actual names, not the short version :-)
>>
>>If I run:
>>DIR /S *a*.dbf > testme.txt it returns me about 8000 names (no time to test if ALL they are correct, but first 150 are) for less then 2 secs.
>
>Thanks a lot for your tests, Borislav. Let me try to run it directly one more time.


O, I forgot to say, I run this through Remote DeskTop not through LogMeIn.