>Actually, I think the twit filter is fine the way it is. If I want to filter out someone's posts, there is absolutely no reason why it should matter to him/her to begin with or why I should be required to let them know if they are twitted or why they are twitted.
At least some people strongly disagree on this one.
>It may be as simple as the fact that maybe I only want to view messages posted by 10 of the 1000 posters. If someone twits me and I find out, I may ask them why but they are under no obligation to tell me.
Well then, in case a comment could be placed, you could simply comment that.
But seriously, I really wonder what this forum is worth for someone if that person filters out all but 10 posters. Nobody here can know in advance who will gonna give the 3-star answer to a question. I wouldn't bet in ALL cases on our Ace, Sergey Berezniker.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
