I admit that I am really at a loss as to the reason. Can you think of any? I cannot. The only thing I can come up with is that those countries cannot be hypocrits - they criticize the U.S. for acting outside the UN so now they must all wait for the UN to decide to act? Otherwise, I really do not understand it either.



>Humanity is useless.
>
>
>>Sweden can't do anything because all of their money goes into paying for the highest quality of living in the world (or near the highest anyway). Remember, we would all be better off if we moved to Sweden... :o)
>>
>>I think (IMHO) that the other countries are reluctant to get involved given the religion of the primary guilty parties...
>
>
>You maybe right, but I still don't understand.
>What if it were atheist against atheist? Would they do something?
>Or Christians killing Muslims?
>
>
>
>>
>>In this case, the U.S. is backing UN intervention but the UN decided (see the links) that genocide was not the intention although war crimes had been committed so no forced UN intervention is going to place yet.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Wait a minute.
>>>You mean France, Germany, Italy and Spain (don't for get Sweden and others) are too poor to do something?
>>>
>>>Come on..... I can't believe that.....
>>>
>>>
>>>>Don't you really mean if only to provide $?
>>>>
>>>>SNIP
>>>>>And, of course, the U.S. is a NECESSARY player in such efforts, if only to provide logistical support.
>>>>
>>>>(Actually, I agree with you on this Jim.)