>>>>>>CNN: Flatulence on plane sparks emergency landing
>>>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2006/TRAVEL/12/06/plane.passing.gas.ap/index.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hilarious. Next they are going to ban beans from airport restaurants.
>>>>>
>>>>>The perpetrator has to walk home – alone!
>>>>
>>>>That's terrible. I think all the other passengers should have been forced off the plane instead.
>>>
>>>Man, you sure have a weird train of thought on this (kind of) issue!!!
>>>
>>>In this case the person not only had a contraband item on the plane (a book of matches) but actually also USED them! There's no comparison between that versus being fearful of a fellow passenger who has passed all security checks but who gives you the willies.
>>
>>Until I hear what she has to say in a press conference, I'm assuming it's all lies. Besides with the perfect security she had to go through, she couldn't possibly have had a book of matches on her.
>
>Jerk is too polite a word to use, so I won't use it. And the UT bans other more appropriate descriptions.

Ok, then explain it to my simple mind. Why is it impossible that the Imams might have gotten anything through security, but possible for her.

One of your main arguments on the other thread is that we must rely on the screening process, and if they got on the plane, then we have to assume they have nothing with them that they could use to cause trouble. That if anybody complains, they should be kicked off because they are failing to rely on the security screening.

That's obviously paraphrasing, but you said it enough times that I think I managed to grasp the gist of it.