I still cannot believe that you think the Dutch are guilty. We don't have enough information to know that they COULD HAVE DONE ANYTHING whether they wanted to or not.


Let me give you an example:

1. I am hired by UN to protect you. I understand that to be my orders.
2. When I show up and we meet, I promise to protect you.
3. The UN later calls me and tells me that I can only observe what happens, but not use force to protect you.
4. You are attacked, I call the UN to verify my orders and the UN tells me that my latest orders are correct: I cannot act unless I am attacked. Since I am not attacked, I do nothing.
5. Am I at fault or is the UN?


>>Metin, I really think there is a language barrier here.
>
>Yes, I have a language problem with english. So I forced tell mine... :(
>
>>
>>From my viewpoint, you see it as:
>>
>>1. The Dutch were complicit (in collusion with the Serbs either by assisting or looking the other way) in the murder of Bosnian Muslims.
>
>No. Sure, they didn't helped massacre with intentionally. But they're guilty. Because they promised a hard thing which they really can't, bosnians trusted their promise. They didn't keep theirs word. They watched a massacre. So they didn't deserve these medals...
>
>These medals injured bosnians. But I see you couldn't hear theirs scream...