>>>>This is (at least) the second time that you have encountered an overly depressing situation OF SOMEONE ELSE'S CHOICE. In both cases people gave you excellent advise. But you just will not take it!
>>>>
>>>>At least STOP BOTHERING US with your personal turmoils of this nature. We've tried to help and been REJECTED. How do you think we feel as this goes on-and-on-and-on???? You will not stop until you have gotten the attention of the other person who (you believe) has silghted you. Why don't you pester them in THEIR e-mail and leave us out of it???? We've tried, we've failed, and WE WANT TO MOVE ON!
>>>
>>>How CRUDE you are here, Jim! I mean it. And although you frequently use the words US and WE, you certainly do not speak on MY behalf.
>>
>>Geez. I guess if I was on your twit filter you wouldn't have to put up with such crap < s >.
>>
>>I didn't expect that I was talking on your behalf in my use of "we" and "us", because I was referring to those of US who have tried UNSUCCESSFULLY to give her advice. Those of YOU who successfully got advice into her head or those of you who didn't offer her advice at all are naturally exempted.
>>
>>Tell me, Peter, how I should have said what I wanted to say?... Or are you suggesting that it is something that shouldn't have been said at all?
>
>You are really p*ss*d off, aren't you? All that yelling at Naomi, calling my words crap ...
>
>This is your dark side, Jim? Every now and then?

May I suggest a course in remedial reading, Peter. How do you associate my use of the word "crap" with your words? The "crap" is referring to my words (which you wouldn't have to see if I was on your twit filter).
What dark side Peter?... Saying what's on my mind?

You also didn't answer what I asked you... how should I have said what I said?