>>Walter.
>>
>>Let me ask you this. If the western powers got together and confronted all the murders and thugs and thieves around the world, do you believe we would still have the killing in Darfur and Rowanda? And would Jung-Il Kim and Amadinejad be as bold as they are now?
>>
>>If the western power get together and show some real bite to their threats and resolutions, there probably won't be any need for war. It's only when we become PAPER TIGER things get out of hand and drastic actions is needed.
>
>
>What happen if 'murders and thugs and thieves' somehow overtake power in
>US and/or some other western countries ?
>That 'papper tiger' wld then turn into killer beast and eat up all of us together!

Look. I believe the US and other western countries stand for something good, at least I thought it did back in the day. Well I guess that is the problem. The so called advance culture no longer stand for anything. Just give me my 12 weeks of vacation and my entitlements and leave me alone... right?

>
>There is NO EXCUSE for one country or group of countries attacking another
>under no circumstances. This is just as wrong as when group of angry people attack and kill an arsonist or rapist without taking him to court.

So there is never a need for war and nothing is worth fighting for?

Who said anything about a war anyway? Like I said if the so called good powers of the world stood together, there may never be any reason for war.

But I know I'm probably just dreaming.... it will never happen. So people will continue to get murdered and slaughtered. Again, I say humanity is hopeless and useless.


>They are just as guilty (from then and on) as that rapist.

OK, I'll remember that next time I see a poor helpless person being mugged/raped. I'll just ignor it and mind my own business.


>
>World needs means of controling (and overturning if you want) rogue
>regimes/dictatorships and prevent cases like Rwanda , but that power has to be in a hands of neutral international body, rather then few 'buddy countries' taking world justice in their own hands.
>
>UN as world's nest for all global bodies, was/is an ideal candidate to be UPGRADED into sort of 'mother state' for all world countries, and ensuring that global issues can be dealed with efficiently. It needs real parliament, it needs real courts and of course low enforcement powers.
>
>At the moment UN has it's problems, but which organisation does not?
>But UN or World parlament is important as an IDEA and PROCESS twds achieving global peace and prosperity. Just like EU is mother state to all independent European countries, UN and World Parliament could be mother state to all world countries. Maybe not as such, but defenetely adopting some of EU
>principles & practices.
>
>set DayDreaming off
>
>But that Idea lost it's momentum after 9/11, or that momentum was
>hijacked away by 'Bush&Son & Asscociates - WorldJustice Enterprises Ltd' and it's current 'share holders'.
>World boat has been badly shaken and currently we don't know where we are going, but perhaps one day in some calmer waters, our little planet will rediscover need for it - and restart this process all over again.

UN? good luck with all that. The same type of people that are killing the poor people in Darfur are running UN.




>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>