Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Add + 1 to code
Message
From
14/12/2006 10:34:06
 
 
To
14/12/2006 10:11:09
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
Title:
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01177374
Message ID:
01177598
Views:
13
Hi Denis,

Before I bought VFP9 I was using VFP7, that did not include this feature.

At this moment, I'm not sure if I should keep using the good and old way or use the AUTOINC fields... My main doubt is that it is possible that I convert my DBC to SQL server, and I don't know which approach will offer me the easiest way to upsize my DBCs.

Cesar



>Any special reason why you're not using autoinc fields?
>
>>Hi Cesar,
>>
>>I'm sorry, but I really don't know since I don't use the autoinc field myself.
>>
>>>Hi Tore,
>>>
>>>I've been using Craig Berntson's tip for some years with success.
>>>But I still never used the Autoinc Integer fields.
>>>
>>>Is there a difference in security from one way to the other ?
>>>I'm using the native DBC
>>>
>>>TIA
>>>
>>>Cesar
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>would you not be better of making code an integer(autoinc) field?
>>>>>
>>>>>How can I do it ?
>>>>>
>>>>>if this is a multi user app is there not a (very small) risk of two people updating the table at the same time and getting the same code value ?
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes it's an application that might have up to 5 computer in a network
>>>>>Is there any risk ?
>>>>
>>>>Yes, there's a huge risk, and it's no easy task to overcome. Read here for a solution: http://www.craigberntson.com/Articles/kb006.htm
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform