Ok. Thanks for the clarification.


>John,
>
>I'm proposing this as an option, not a requirement. As I see it the existing login can remain in place with a link to an optional secure login for those who can and want to use it.
>
>-Rick
>
>
>>If he does that he locks out any user whose corporate policy is to lock down access. We had to get special access to the thread as an exception. If he makes it secure, we won't have access.
>