>>I know what you're trying to do. I believe I'm trying to help you. I don't believe one more "signature" will make a difference.
>
>I'm lucky not all who signed so far thought that way. :)

I suggest that if you took the approach of Stop Unfair Taxation rather than Leave Canada Now, you may get far more signatures.

100 people does not make a "movement". The government will just laugh.

I'd suggest you contact your MP. I suspect no Canadian Politician will involve themselves with "Leave Canada Now". Other Canadian e-businesses should be joining, but they may shy away from the current message too.

>
>>Speaking of confusing. Are you threatening me? Do you mean *I* may be forbidden access to the UT or do you mean *Canadians* may be forbidden? Just by using one wrong word, you can drastically alter your meaning.
>
>If we loose our appeal, the only other alternative to remove this international tax would be to request a new ruling. The only way a new ruling would confirm us that we do not have to tax our international customers is by forbidden access to the site to Canadian members as well as anyone trying to access it from inside the Canadian borders. The ruling is really straight forward on this. Because the site is not accessed exclusively outside the boundaries, thus, it makes it taxable because one could use it from Canada. So, this is why they are forcing me to tax the international customers. So, as the market is 90% international, loosing 10% will allow me to keep UT running.

I said that to demonstrate the power of clarity. You seemed to miss the point. I don't know what else to say to convince you.