sele inward
tableupdate(.t.,.t.)

Thats the safest way as at any time u add or edit only one record in that cursor
It is equivalent to what u wand to achive.

Rajesh


>i have converted my code :
>
>i placed code as below
>in load event :
>
>

>cursorsetprop("buffering",5,'inward')
>cursorsetprop("buffering",5,'inward1')
>

>
>
>
>in "ADD" command button
>

>sele inward
>

>
>
>
>** single records in this parent table, but i am using table buffering because if my record pointer move to next records it update the record to table so i am not using row buffering.
>

>appe blank
>repl reco1 with str(recno)+str(seconds(),10,3) && Records no -1
>go recno()
>sele inward1  && multiple records in this child table.
>appe blank
>repl reco1 with inward.reco1
>go recno()
>

>
>
>
>in "SAVE" command button
>
>

>sele inward
>tableupdate(.f.,.t.) && single record
>sele inward1
>tableupdate(.t.,.t.) && Multi records
>

>
>
>after saving first invoice, if i add one more invoice by cliking on "ADD" button
>
>

>sele inward
>appe blank
>repl reco1 with str(recno)+str(seconds(),10,3)   && Records no -2
>

>
>
>it is showing me record no -2, but after tableupdate(.f.,.t.) it should be -1
>
>should i use like :
>
>

>sele inward
>tableupdate(.t.,.t.)
>

>
>
>
>warm regards,
>mk.