>Oh... Come on, Jim. Where the previous "Persons of the Year" more important or less "marketing-driven"? 8-)

My problem isn't with how they decided what they did, but their claim as to WHY they chose who they chose.
It is a pipe dream of the highest magnitude to pretend thw ***WE*** now have taken control of media in any way, shape or form.

And I already voted on UT (though I didn't even know it was underway until someone else mentioned a problem).



>
>The really recognition is UT's Personality of the Year. Truly based on peer-review and professional recognition. Cast you vote now! (this is marketing also, of course). <g>
>
>Regards,