Thank you for your prompt reply but, here, Rushmore is simply not the issue.
No fields that would be involved with Rushmore optimization have been changed . Additionally the query itself is completely unchanged.
Something else is going on to cause this for no obvious (to us) reason. Other ideas?
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only