Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
T.O. fined, not suspended, for spitting
Message
From
19/12/2006 14:15:12
 
 
To
19/12/2006 09:15:56
General information
Forum:
Sports
Category:
Football
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01178662
Message ID:
01178948
Views:
44
--While I'd be happy to see TO suspended, based on what I saw on TV, this punishment is in line with previous punishments for spitting.

That's actually debatable.

The Titans benched rookie standout LenDale White for a pre-season game, for spitting at a teammate.

To say that it's 'in line' with previous punishments, assumes that the previous punishments were sufficient.

It's too bad that the refs didn't see T.O. spitting at Hall - given that it was so early in the game, they could have tossed T.O. for the game, and that would have been sufficient punishment.

Like it or not, teenage athletes imitate the antics of the pros. They're also smart enough to know that T.O. has plenty of money, and that a fine means very very little [though, to make matters even more pathetic, T.O. is appealing the fine].

But sitting a player, even if it's a big game coming up, sends the right message to everyone. Coaches everywhere can use it as a precedent to show kids about consequences. I still say the NFL is too scared to suspend T.O., because the next game is against Philly on Christmas evening and has huge playoff implications.

I'm a firm believer that punishments sometimes need to 'send a message'. While off-topic, the NBA suspensions are being criticized for 'sending a message' - yet that's EXACTLY what needs to be done. David Stern doesn't let team impact or lost endorsements or other factors affect his decisions - his focus is always on the incident itself.

Kevin
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform