sorry wrong link. this is waht I meant from BBC.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6115644.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6178213.stm?ls is the one that Nigel gave me.


>>From the same page, these link....
>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6178213.stm?ls
>
>Did any scientists outside of the U.S. sign? Or do we have another WMD situation where almost nobody outside the U.S. believed it and the U.S. assertions turned out to be [let's be kind here] ... doubtful.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>I guess we can exchange links all day long.
>>
>>The reason I started this link is because the book had been "peer-reviewed", meaning its been review by other experts.
>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4600402.stm
>>
>>my opinion about GW (global warming) had very little to do with it.
>>
>>
>>>>Looks to me he has good credentials.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/061109/nyth021.html?.v=71
>>>>>>
>>>>>>By couple of Amospheric Physicists.
>>>>>
>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Singer
>>>
>>>hhhhmmmmm
>>>
>>>while we're on the subject...
>>>
>>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6178213.stm?ls