>>>>>>AI is hardly an unbiased account.
>>>>>
>>>>>Why do you think that? As far as I know, they fight for human rights all over the World. I don't see any reason to charge them of being biased.
>>>>
>>>>It depends. While they were reporting from behind the former Iron Curtain, they were unbiased. When they were reporting from Africa or Asia, they were unbiased. As soon as they started talking about Guantanamo, they became very biased and have never been trustworthy.
>>>
>>>
>>>I don't keep up with them that closely. What have they said about Guantanamo? They should have been outraged.
>>
>>The U.S. government is not happy with AI and other human rights organizations reporting about Guantanamo, or about the secret CIA concentration camps in Europe.
>
>
>Did you change lanes there? Before you seemed to say AI became biased and untrustworthy about Guantanamo. Now you're criticizing the U.S. Can we get back to the AI question? We can return to the wild card of "secret CIA concentration camps in Europe" after that.

He's being facetious. He's saying that these opinions are 'according to the U.S.A.'. As long as they were criticising the U.S. 'enemies', they were trustworthy. When they started criticising the U.S. itself, they were biased.