snip

>I don't have a high opinion of your press. It is indeed owned by a couple of corporations and are highly influenced by their supported political parties and associated coroporations. Therefore I can't call it independed press. As stated before by others like Dragan and Jim it is more of an entertainment value rather than news and has been highly commercialized. The journalistical value is far down IMO. I remember the interview with Bill Clinton and his snare to the owner of fox (murdoch?) a couple of months ago. Something like that would be unthinkable up here. It outlines again that the political objectives of the media bleed though the news to report.

snip

You're talking out of your butt again, Walter. You don't know squat about the American press. Sure, some of it is better than others, as I am sure is the case "up here." Fox News would be an excellent example. We also have some of the best newspapers and magazines in the world. Anyone who can't stay informed here doesn't want to stay informed.