>>>John, you keep saying garbage like that. I've looked at the research, it disagrees with you.
>>
>>Ah, but the research you looked up is biased. It's not balanced by a proper amount of oil money, so it must be worthless.
>
>Ah yes!


Hi fives all around for our team!



Now back to business.

If the "scientific research" has identified the cause global warming, then there should be some sort of hypothesis that was tested.

What was that hypothesis?

And in testing that hypothesis, what sort of experimental controls were used?

Fact: there is no testable hypothesis, no control experiment, and no scientific results regarding the causes of the changes we are currently seeing on a planet that has always been and always will be undergoing change.